Conclusion (6)


In May 1996, the Constitution Review Group suggested five options which are possible in order to clarify the law on abortion. Without a Constitutional Amendment, the DARG believes that the fifth option which they put forward is the most preferable. Thus, the application of Article 40.3.3, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in the X case, should be regulated by legislation. In this approach, the DARG is of the same view as the Constitution Review Group. The DARG's central aim, however, is a Constitutional Amendment to remove Article 40.3.3 by Constitutional Amendment.

The DARG would therefore recommend that as an immediate measure, legislation should be introduced to implement the X case test, covering such matters as definition of 'unborn', protection for appropriate medical intervention, and the certification of 'real and substantial risk to the life of the mother' (see the definitions provided above).

However, the DARG would argue that a repeal of the Eighth Amendment is necessary, in order to guarantee through legislation the right of women to obtain free and freely available abortion in Ireland.


Part of the pages of the Dublin Abortion Rights Group